1 Goltitaxe

Downfall Definition Example Essay

Oedipus' Downfall Essay example

774 WordsJul 6th, 20134 Pages

Prompt: In a well-developed essay, consider whether hubris, fate or both are the use of Oedipus’ downfall. Use evidence from the text to support your support.

Hubris is defined as excessive pride or self-confidence, while fate is defined as the supposed force, principle, or power that predetermines events. Ancient Greeks believed in Hubris, or pride. Pride may have been seen as good or bad. Many people that exhibit pride may come off as being proud of their achievements or lives; however, pride can rise to levels in where it may annoy or offend others. Therefore, pride may cause ones downfall. Sometime fate can also cause ones’ downfall such as pride. , since events in someone’s life are predestined. In a play, there may be such a…show more content…

On the other hand, the fear of Oedipus fulfilling his prophecy had very little use to his downfall unlike hubris having a big role in his downfall.

Oedipus’ destiny or fate had little to do with his downfall. The prophet told Oedipus that he was destined to kill his father and marry his mother, but the prophet never mentioned Oedipus murdering Laius on the highway, or solving the Sphinx’s riddle, or accepting and taking advantage of his kingship. Oedipus blinding himself was an example of free will, “for he removed from…[Jocasta’s] garment the golden brooches which she was wearing…” by choice “…and struck the sockets of his own eyes..” blinding himself Free will and hubris, according to the ancient Greeks, were separate from unavoidable fate. Oedipus’s fate was to kill his father and marry his mother. However, everything else, including fleeing Corinth, solving the Sphinx’s riddle, and finally pursuing the truth about his life, was by his own free will, a direct result of his ego and pride. Oedipus Rex is a story about the dangers of pride and arrogance, one teaching about the importance of humility and tolerance, and one stressing about the control of hubris, a potentially perilous quality that destroyed Oedipus’s vision and his life.

Read more: http://bookstove.com/drama/oedipus-and-hubris/#ixzz2HFzedWXu. All of these

Show More

Show More

Oedipus reading questions

The dramatic purpose of the prologue is to place the audience I the middle of the action with as little friction as possible. All the information to continue and understand the play is placed at the beginning known as the prologue. It is much like the reverse scrolling at the beginning of star wars movies. Oedipus sees himself much like the parent of Thebes. He knows he has a natural benevolence in himself to be a good king and have general concern over the people of Thebes. He finds it to be his duty the care for the people when there is so much suffering in his country. His view is somewhat accurate in that he does care for the people of Thebes and it is out of the goodness of his heart but at the same…show more content…

While the two converse, Oedipus shows signs of great disbelief at the surprising prophecy. He is so headstrong in learning of his fate, but when his prognosis is less than ideal, he reacts in a very human manner. He may be somewhat stubborn in accepting his fate, but his outburst is understood. His reaction is not hated by the audience, because of this; Oedipus is more easily related in this scene. Who wouldn’t respond with disbelief upon being told such a prophecy?

On the surface it is clear who is blind and who is not. Oedipus has full capability of his eyesight while Teiresias is a blind old man who needs a young person to lead him everywhere. But the implications of that the ironies assert puts forth a situation of role reversal. Although Teiresias is a blind man, he is a prophet, capable of seeing what normal people with sight cannot. While Teiresias has a 20/20 view of the future, Oedipus might as well be staring at his own through a brick. He is incapable of viewing his own future. As a result the motif of vision plays a large part in the arguments in this dialogue. The two bicker over who has practical sight. Oedipus calls Teiresias a “sightless, witless, senseless, mad old man” while Teiresias retorts

Leave a Comment

(0 Comments)

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *