1 Kelkis

9 11 Essay Conclusion Strategies

Transcript

The standard essay format that you’re introduced to in middle school and high school has a three part structure: there’s an introductory section, a main body and a conclusion.

There are conventional rules for what to include and not include in each of these sections, and if you want to improve your academic essay writing there’s no doubt that you need to understand these rules.

But I think anyone who teaches essay writing, and anyone who wants to improve their essay writing, should acknowledge that not all essays are written this way, and that the conventional rules for academic essays can be quite restrictive — there is, for lack of a better term, an expressivecost to following the rules.

In this video I want to talk about the rationale for the conventional rules, and more specifically how and when the benefits of following them outweigh the costs.

The Standard Three-Part Structure

The most striking feature of the conventional academic essay format is how introductions and conclusions are written.

(1) Introductory Section

The introductory section of an academic essay is supposed to do three things:

First, we use it to introduce the subject of the essay, and more specifically, the issue with respect to the subject. The subject might be, say, the ethics of sport hunting. The issue might be whether hunting with bow and arrow is more or less humane than rifle hunting.

If the issue is somewhat complex or unfamiliar you may need to spend a bit of time on this introductory section, providing enough background and context for the reader to understand, in rough outline, what the issue is.

Second, we state the thesis of the essay. The thesis is the position or stance that the essay is going to take, on the issue in question.

And third, it’s often recommended that the author say something about how the rest of the essay is going to be organized, so the reader has some idea of what to expect and how the argument is going to unfold. This becomes increasingly important as essays become longer and more complicated.

(2) Main Body

Moving on to the main body of the essay, the structure of the main body will differ depending on the kind of essay you’re writing. Here I’ll just review the features of a standard argumentative essay.

The primary goal of the main body is to present the central argument of the essay. There are many ways of doing this, but an essential part of any argumentative essay is to consider natural objections to the main argument, and then present replies that defend the argument against those objections.

(3) Concluding Section

Now, in the concluding section of the standard academic essay, you’re expected to restate the main thesis, review and summarize the key argumentative moves you made in the essay, and if you want you can offer some final commentary on the topic. These elements of the concluding section become more important and more prominent as essays become longer and more professional. If you look at articles written for academic journals you’ll find that these elements are standard.

"Do I Have to Write Like This?"

So these are the conventional rules for organizing an academic essay.

I don’t want to generalize, but I think we have to admit that the style of essay writing I just described isn’t one we normally associate with engaging literary style. It can be dry and stiff and predictable.

I’ve had students ask me, in all seriousness, whether they have to write like this, like there’s something obviously unappealing about these writing conventions.

I think these questions have a point, I think they deserve to be answered. So let’s push the question further.

Many non-academic essay writing styles will try to invite or entice the reader to continue reading, but they won’t disclose the main point of the essay up front — they’ll save the “punchline”, as it were, until the end, for obvious reasons.

Telegraphing your punchline in the setup of your joke would ruin the joke.

Similarly, telegraphing the main point of your essay in the introduction makes it difficult to build a narrative with the potential to surprise the reader. If every essayist felt pressured to show all their cards in the opening paragraphs of their essay, they would rightly find that a burdensome restriction.

All of this is to say that there’s nothing in the nature of essay writing per se that requires this kind of style.

But then if it’s standard in academic writing then there must be some reason for it, some benefit that outweighs the costs.

So let’s talk about what these benefits are.

The Function of the Standard Three-Part Essay Structure

The standard conventions of academic writing only make sense under the assumption that you’re writing for a certain kind of audience whose interests are served by this format.

All of this makes more sense if you realize that at the highest levels, academia is a profession, and the primary currency that this profession trades in, is peer recognition and approval.

Whether I’m a physicist or a philosopher or an English literature expert, to participate in the profession you need to produce research, and in most cases this takes the form of written research articles that are published in professional academic journals, or it takes the form of longer, book-length monographs.

In either case, your work is subject to a process of PEER REVIEW, before it can get into the hands of the broader research community or the general public.

At the first level of the peer review process, your immediate audience is an editor of some kind. The job of a journal editor is to facilitate the process of academic gate-keeping and quality control.

The journal editor receives many submissions, more than they can publish. They have to quickly assess the the relevance of the submission for their audience, which is other professional academics in their field.

If it passes this first stage of assessment then the editor has to identify qualified reviewers within the field who will conduct a more thorough review of the submission.

Their reports are sent back to the editor, who then makes a decision about whether the submission should be published, accepted for publication conditional on making certain minor changes, sent back to the author with a recommendation to revise and resubmit, or reject the submission outright.

That’s your "level 1" audience. Ultimately what you want is that your academic peers get access to your work through publication in the standard peer-reviewed venues.

Your professional peers are your level 2 audience. But they face the same predicament as journal editors, in the sense that even if your submission finds its way into a journal that they regularly read, no one has the time or energy to read everything.

So everyone needs a strategy for deciding whether a given article is relevant to your interest and worth the time and energy to read all the way through.

And if you were in that situation, it would be very much in your interest that articles are written in a standard form and in such a way that in the first few paragraphs you can quickly judge whether the article is relevant to your own research.

This gets us closer to understanding why the standard academic essay format is what it is.

It’s a form of writing that makes it easy for a person who has limited time and energy, and who has a specific interest in certain topics, to identify whether the essay is relevant to those topics. Everyone in academia, from working professionals to editors to graduate students, benefits from the standardization that is built in to the conventional three-part essay format.

So, are there good reasons why the conventions are what they are? The answer is yes, there are good reasons. There are costs, in terms of predictability and a certain utilitarian dryness, but from the perspective of working academics, the benefits clearly outweigh these costs.

But Why Impose This Convention on Students?

Now, there’s an obvious question that this analysis raises.

If the justification for these academic essay writing conventions is that they’re important for professional academic writing, why are they so often taught as though they were basic to essay writing in general?

In writing instruction guides aimed at high school students, you often see some version of this three-part structure presented without any context, like it was part of a definition of what a “proper” essay should look like.

This is nonsense, there is no such definition. There are plenty of different models for successful essay writing.

So why is it so often taught as though it was the only model?

Well, if you ask high school teachers they’ll probably tell you that it’s a good model to teach students because

  • it’s a model that students are expected to be familiar with when they enter college,
  • it’s a model that can get you a good score on the essay-writing portion of college admission tests, and
  • it’s a model that signalscompetency in essay writing — in other words, in many places it’s used as a standard for judging competency in writing skills.

And in their more cynical moods they’ll tell you that it’s challenging enough to teach justone model for essay writing, when so few students are good at even this one model.

There's obviously a lot of truth to these observations. But let’s at least acknowledge that these reasons have more to do with the practical realities of education than with good writing per se.

Good writers need to understand the rules of a conventional style and the reasons behind the rules, so that they can use them when doing so serves their communicative goals and break them when they don’t.

In the next video we’ll take a closer look at the concept of writing style, and how writing structure emerges out of a deliberate choice of style.

Hello.

Today, we're going to discuss conclusions and conclusions for

many people are the hardest part of a writing project.

And if for me, I have a lot of trouble with conclusions even in these videos at

the end of some of the videos have been like stuck with how to end the video

like in the beginning of the video, I could say hello,

I could talk about what we're going to do in the video.

But at the end I almost always stumble over exactly how to end it.

I think it feels a little abrupt.

And so in your conclusions that you are using when you're writing projects,

please try to think about not being abrupt.

You want to think about how to effectively conclude.

The reason conclusions are hard for people is very practical, I think.

People by the time they're writing conclusions they might be up against

a deadline and just don't have time to adequately devote to the conclusion.

They might also feel a little bit tired of their writing project.

They've already said everything you want to say in a writing project and so

what do you put in a conclusion?

People also have questions about how to start a conclusion, they don't know how to

kind of signal to readers that it's time to move into a conclusion.

So they'll revert to a phrase like to in conclusion or

to conclude, and sometimes in some context that's okay.

Were going to think today about alternatives to that because I think there

are a number of alternatives to had actually moved in to the conclusion.

And the final aspect of conclusions that's hard for

people is to decide how long a conclusion should be.

And sometimes there are paragraph, sometimes there are couple paragraphs,

it kind of depends on the context in which you're writing.

But the important thing to remember with conclusions is that they're

really important.

They're the last moment you have in which you can talk to your readers.

So please do take time and

care with your conclusions and use them to your advantage.

It's one of the power positions in your writing.

The title, the first sentence, the introduction, transition sentences,

your argument sentence, the conclusion, the closing sentence,

these are all power positions where you're thinking

this is really the moment where you can have a great impact on your readers.

The purpose of conclusions in general includes the following three aspects.

To recap what has been said,

some busy readers even if you hook them in the beginning as best as you can.

And even if you're so well renowned and

respected in the field that people generally hang on every word you say.

Even still some busy readers will not read the whole essay and

only read the conclusion to kind of get to the heart of the matter.

So imagine that you're recapping for readers what has come before.

You want to emphasize what's significant.

What's the purpose of your having written this argument?

What do you really want readers to take away from it?

Think about why it's important?

What's significant?

Some people refer to this as the so what question.

So as a reader maybe I'll read your writing.

And then I'll say, so what?

What do you want me to do with it?

And this is your chance in the conclusion to share that with people.

And then finally, a third element is to point towards future directions.

Scholarly writing is an ongoing conversation.

What you say you hope other people are going to take away and

do other stuff with.

So what are some possible ideas for

either future areas of inquiry or new areas of application or

things you didn't have a chance to cover or study or research for this?

You can point your readers in some of those general directions.

We will be looking at a full conclusion in a second.

But let's first examine some closing sentences to see

the way that some of the writers we've been reading chose to actually end with

the final sentence of their paper.

Final sentence is really important.

It's the last words that people will read right before they move on.

So make it an important sentence.

Here's Coyle's sentence.

More stars, Clifford says, are on the way.

And I would say that this is an example of Coyle saying that it's kind of a hopeful.

It's pointing to the future so all kinds of more stars are up and coming

its also though giving away that final spot to Clifford, so that was a choice

that Coyle made to kind of offer another writer that final moment in his essay.

Here's Colvin's, but the striking,

liberating news is that greatness isn't reserved for a preordained few.

It is available to you and to everyone.

And here again is that kind of inspirational call to action at

the end trait.

You can do this, this is important, this is why it's significant.

And here's Charness and Tufiash.

Despite the difficulty in pursuing research with experts,

the studies undertaken in domains such as sports, medicine and aviation

during the past decade, show the promise of the expert performance approach.

And so here too, we have another example of future directions.

The promise of the expert performance approach.

And so in all these cases this is a writer saying this is the kind of,

I'm inspiring you, I'm inspiring something something beyond what I have written.

Here's and example of Colvin's conclusion and again,

as with the introduction that we looked at Colvin's conclusion is several paragraphs.

In your work, you may not have several paragraphs or

you might have more than several paragraphs.

It kind of depends on the context.

So here's his signal that he's moving away from the body

of his essay to the conclusion, for most people.

I can imagine him kind of thinking that readers are going to take a breath,

this is the beginning of a new paragraph, it's a breath for most people.

It's also a move kind of more to a bird's eye view or a view above.

Applying what he's maybe been talking about to a more perspective.

This is an alternative to him having written in conclusion or to conclude,

which would have been another choice he made, but

I think this is a smoother version.

The critical reality is that we are not hostage

to some naturally granted level of talent.

And I would say at this point that Colvin is moving to do

that kind of work of inspiring his readers or

a call to action of some kind like a rallying call.

We can make ourselves what we will.

Strangely, that idea is not popular and then still, he's showing the significance.

People hate abandoning the notion that they would coast to fame and

riches if they found their talent.

But that view is tragically constraining.

Because when they hit life's inevitable bumps in the road

they conclude that they just aren't gifted and give up.

Maybe we can't expect most people to achieve greatness.

It's just too demanding, but the striking liberating news

is that greatness isn't reserved for a preordained few.

It is available to you and

to everyone and here, that's like kind of the inspiring final ending.

And this is also a kind of the challenge to readers.

Maybe it's just too demanding for you.

Maybe you can't do it, which as a reader what I get from this is that's not

too demanding for me, I can do it.

So these are the choices that Colvin made in his conclusion,

and I'm interested to see what choices you make in your conclusion.

Leave a Comment

(0 Comments)

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *