Research Paper Outline Video Game Violence Chart
Effects of Violent Video Games on Children: A Comprehensive Research List
1) An examination of psychoticism and motion capture controls as moderators of the effects of violent video games.Markey et al. (2009).
Conclusion: Individuals with elevated levels of psychotocism responded to violent video games with an increase in self-reported aggression and hostility.
2) Exposure to violent video games and aggression in German adolescents: A longitudinal analysis.Moller et al. (2009).
Conclusion: Longitudinal study finding that exposure to video game violence predicted physical (but not relational) aggression 30 months later.
3) Violent video games put teens at risk.Kalning (2009).
Conclusion: Brain scans reveal "negative effects of violent video games" with teens.
4) Violent video games have not been proven to harm teens. Radford (2009).
Conclusion: Studies arguing that playing violent video games has a negative effect on children are generally lacking in scientific validity.
5) Experimental study of the differential effects of playing versus watching violent video games on children's aggressive behavior. Polman et al (2008).
Conclusion: Actively playing violent video games (as compared to passively watching the same games) leads to an increased perception of aggressiveness in boys. The effect did not hold true for girls.
6) Violent video games and aggression: Causal relationship or byproduct of family violence and intrinsic violence motivation? Ferguson et al. (2008).
Conclusion: Trait aggression, family violence, and male gender were predictive of violent crime, but exposure to violent games was not.
7) Hostile and hardened? An experimental study on (de-)sensitization to violence and suffering through playing video games. Staude-Müller et al. (2008).
Conclusion: Self-reported emotional responses to aggressive pictures were not affected by playing violent video games. Physiological responses (skin conductance) suggested sensitization to aggressive cues.
8) Gender, video game playing habits and visual memory tasks. Ferguson et al. (2008).
Conclusion: Playing violent video games is associated with higher visual memory recall.
9) The role of violent video game content in adolescent development: Boys' perspectives. Olson et al (2008).
Conclusion: Boys aged 12-14 did not believe that they experienced any negative effects of violent video games, but believed that younger children might imitate violent games. They did not believe that video games cause violence.
10) The school shooting/violent video game link: Casual relationship or moral panic? Ferguson et al. (2008).
Conclusion: No significant effects of violent video games and school shooting incidents have been demonstrated in the existing scientific literature. Authors did not believe that violent video game cause violence in the real world.
11) Violent video games and anger as predictors of aggression. Giumetti et al. (2007).
Conclusion: Angry people are more likely to show negative effects of violent video games.
12) The good, the bad and the ugly: A meta-analytic review of positive and negative effects of violent video games. Ferguson et al. (2007).
Conclusion: Once corrected for publication bias, studies of video game violence provide no support for the hypothesis that playing violent video games is associated with higher aggression. Playing violent video games is associated with higher visuospatial cognition. Violent video games do not seem to actually cause violence in players.
13) Are violent video games harmful? Porter et al. (2007).
Conclusion: Aggressive behavior may be the result of playing violent video games, the expression of traits that were present before playing violent video games, or it may be a result of several possible combinations of these and other factors. The effects of violent video games and whether video games cause violence in the real world are unclear.
14) The effect of playing violent video games on adolescents: Should parents be quaking in their boots? Unsworth et al. (2007).
Conclusion: Inconsistent research conclusions on the effects of violent videos games are due to differences in methodology. The majority of people who play violent video games show no changes in their level of anger. The assumption that video games cause violence has not been consistently demonstrated in scientific research.
15) Evidence for publication bias in video game violence effects literature: A meta-analytic review. Ferguson et al. (2007).
Conclusion: There is a publication bias for experimental studies of aggressive behavior. The authors suggest that studies demonstrating that video games cause violence are more likely to be published.
16) I wish I were a warrior: The role of wishful identification in the effects of violent video games on aggression in adolescent boys. Konijn, et al. (2007).
Conclusion: Boys who identify with violent video game characters are more likely to be aggressive in a lab setting.
17) Review of the effect of violent video games on children and adolescents. Guo et al. (2007).
Conclusion: Exposure to violent video games increases aggressive behavior, emotional & physiological arousal, and decreases helping behavior. A positive intervention from parents can decrease negative effects of violent video games.
18) The unintended negative consequences of exposure to violent video games. Swing et al. (2007).
Conclusion: A review of the research suggests that children and young adults, males and females, high aggression and low aggression people are all susceptible to increases in aggression, after even short exposures to violent video games.
19) The Appeal of Violent Video Games to Lower Educated Aggressive Adolescent Boys from Two Countries. Lemmens et al. (2006).
Conclusion: Boys who are naturally aggressive are attracted to violent video games. Lower educated boys play more violent video games than higher educated boys. The question of whether violent video games leads to violence in children was left open due to the correlational nature of the studies.
20) Contextual Features of Violent Video Games, Mental Models, and Aggression. Farrar et al. (2006).
Conclusion: The inclusion of blood in video games leads to more physically aggressive intentions while playing the game.
21) Aggressive Political Opinions and Exposure to Violent Media.Eyal et al. (2006).
Conclusion: Exposure to violent television programs was predictive of aggressive political opinions (e.g., forceful resolution to political issues). Exposure to violent video games predicted only a few aggressive opinions.
22) Effects of Affective Orientation and Video Game Play on Aggressive Thoughts and Behaviors. Cicchirillo et al. (2005).
Conclusion: Participants who played a violent video game rated the researcher of the study as less courteous and less deserving of financial support.
23) Correlates and Consequences of Exposure to Video Game Violence: Hostile Personality, Empathy, and Aggressive Behavior. Bartholow et al. (2005).
Conclusion: Repeated exposure to violent video games causes desensitization which then leads to increased aggressive behavior. Violent video games may cause violence and aggression.
24) The Effects of Reward and Punishment in Violent Video Games on Aggressive Affect, Cognition, and Behavior. Carnagey et al. (2005).
Conclusion: Games that reward violent acts can increase aggressive behavior by increasing aggressive thinking.
25) Internet Fantasy Violence: A Test of Aggression in an Online Game. Williams et al. (2005).
Conclusion: Longitudinal study on the effects of violent video games suggests that they do not cause increases in real-world violence.
26) Deciding to Defect: The Effects of Video-Game Violence on Cooperative Behavior.Sheese et al. (2005).
Conclusion: Playing violent video games is associated with increased likelihood to exploit a partner in the study for one's own benefit.
27) Violent Video Games Induce an Affect Processing Bias. Kirsh et al. (2005).
Conclusion: Violent video games are associated with greater cognitive interference for negative words on the Stroop test.
28) Exposure to violent video games increases automatic aggressiveness.Uhlmann et al. (2005).
Conclusion: Playing violent video games can lead to aggressive self-conceptualizations.
29) An update on the effects of playing violent video games. Anderson et al. (2004).
Conclusion: Meta-analysis concluding that exposure to violent video games is linked to increases in aggressive behavior, aggressive cognition, aggressive affect, and cardiovascular arousal, and to decreases in helping behavior. Researchers believe that violent video games are harmful to children.
30) Media violence research and youth violence data: Why do they conflict? Olson et al. (2004).
Conclusion: There is little evidence of a substantial link between exposure to violent interactive games and serious real-life violence or crime. There is insufficient evidence to conclude that video games cause violence outside of the lab setting.
31) Playing violent video games, desensitization, and moral evaluation in children. Funk et al. (2003).
Conclusion: Long-term exposure to violent video games contributes to lower empathy scores on hypothetical vignettes.
32) Immediate and Prolonged Effects of Videogame Violence. Deselms et al. (2003).
Conclusion: Men who played violent video games gave lighter punishments to hypothetical criminals. The effects of violent video games persisted for 1 hour after playing the game.
33) High versus low aggressive priming during video-game training: Effects on violent action during game play, hostility, heart rate, and blood pressure. Panee et al. (2002).
Conclusion: Players that receive aggressive training when first playing a potentially violent video game use more aggressive methods when actually playing the game.
34) Violent video games and hostile expectations: A test of the general aggression model. Bushman et al. (2002).
Conclusion: Compared to those who played a non-violent video game, subjects who played a violent video game attribute more hostile thoughts to characters in fictional stories.
35) Effects of violent video games on aggressive behavior: Potential sex differences. Bartholow et al. (2002).
Conclusion: Compared to playing a non-violent video game, playing a violent video game resulted in more provocation and retaliation against a confederate in a laboratory experiment.
36) Video games and real-life aggression: Review of the literature. Bensley et al. (2001).
Conclusion: Among young children (4-8 yr olds), playing an aggressive video game increased aggressive play during free-play immediately after the video game. Among college students, there is no consistent evidence that playing violent video games affects aggression or hostility.
37) Effects of violent versus nonviolent video games on children's arousal, aggressive mood, and positive mood. Fleming et al. (2001).
Conclusion: Playing a violent video game did not increase the aggressive moods of children. Compared to a paper and pencil game, violent video games increased the positive moods of children.
38) Effects of violent video games on aggressive behavior, aggressive cognition, aggressive affect, physiological arousal, and prosocial behavior: A meta-analytic review of the scientific literature. Anderson et al. (2001).
Conclusion: Playing violent video games increases physiological arousal and aggression-related thoughts and feelings.
39) The effects of violent video games on aggression: A meta-analysis. Sherry et al. (2001).
Conclusion: The effects of violent video games on aggression are less significant than the effects of viewing television violence on aggression.
40) The effects of video game play on young children's aggression, fantasy, and prosocial behavior. Silvern et al. (1987).
Conclusion: Violent video games arouse children in the same way that violent cartoons do.
Playing video games is perceived as an exciting aspect of the media landscape and has experienced much expansion in recent years. There has been a rise in the number of children who use video games in many parts of the world, particularly in the United States (Hagan,et al. 2002). Among children in the United States, playing hours of video games have increased from 4 hours every week in the 1980s, to about 13 hours per week in recent years. Video games have also taken the attention of the public, particularly by the controversies regarding first person shooter games (Anderson, Gentile & Buckley, 2007).
Various studies have shown that violent content in video games desensitizes players, especially children, to real-world violence. When players become desensitized, they tend to increase their aggression and decrease their empathy. Other researchers have indicated that playing video games among children does not lead to significant aggressive behavior, since the magnitude of the effect in the meta-analysis may be an outcome of publication bias. Despite pressure from various societies, many video games contain a considerable amount of violence. Violent games are seen to promote feelings of excitement, satisfaction, and empowerment among players (Hagan, et al. 2002). However, Przybylski et al, carried a study on video games and concluded that the desire and enjoyment for future play were linked to competence and the experience of autonomy in the video game, and not the level of violence. Different scholars have argued about the negative and positive effects of playing video games among children. This research paper will discuss the various effects that playing video games have on children. They impact children’s lives socially and they increase violence among children (Sherry, 2001).
The debate on whether video games have social effects and cause violence among players, especially children, can be traced back to 1976 when a video game entitled Death Race was released on the market. The main aim of the game was to run over screaming gremlins using a car which would then turn into tombstones. The pace of the game was pedestrian and the gremlins resembled human figures. There was a public outcry over this video game and eventually its production ceased. There were other violent video games that were produced later in 1993, such as Night Trap and Mortal Kombat, which were followed by public outcry. In the same year, a board was established in the United States to look into video games and rate them according to their content (Siwek, 2007). The board is known as the entertainment software rating board (ESRB). The other video game that attracted media attention was Rapelay, produced in 2006 (Siwek, 2007). The video game required players to rape and stalk a woman and her two girls. Such video games are said to cause behavioral change among children.
There have been several incidents that are linked to video games, such as the massacre at Columbine High School that claimed 13 lives. Laws have been enacted to ban or control the sale of video games. For example, on the 27th of June 2007, the Supreme Court of the United States overturned the law in California that banned the sale of video games to minors (Siwek, 2007). The court ruled that the law violated the freedom of speech even though the state has an obligation to protect kids from harm. Another aspect that should be noted regarding video games is that boys spend more time playing than girls. Not many girls are interested in playing video games, hence they are not affected as much as boys of a similar age (Anderson & Bushman, 2001).
The Drawbacks of Children Playing Video games
Most of the negative effects as a result of playing video games among children can be blamed on the violent scenes contained in these games. When a child spends an extended amount of time playing such video games, they becomes socially isolated. This means that a child does not have enough time to interact with other members of their society (Anderson & Bushman, 2001). The child who spends many hours a day playing video games will have little time to meet and make new friends. They may in turn become more depressed and lonely in their homes. Children will also spend little time on other activities such as sports, reading, and doing homework. The child becomes socially inactive since they do not get involved in social activities.
Some video games teach children wrong values (Gunter, 1998). Most of the children who spend much of their time playing video games are likely to perform poorly in school. A solid number of video games are addictive. Rather than studying or completing homework, a child spends time playing video games. As a result, poor performance will be seen at schools. Video games reduce a child’s imaginative thinking as well. This means that a child who ends up spending most of their time playing video games does not get a chance to think creatively or independently. Imaginative thinking is crucial in developing a child’s creativity. By fostering isolation, video games may also affect a child’s health. Since they do not get enough bodily exercise, children who spend the majority of their time playing video games are likely to suffer from video-induced seizures, obesity and skeletal, muscular and postural disorders like tendinitis, carpal tunnel syndrome, among others.
Video games promote children to associate happiness and pleasure with the capability to cause pain to others. They develop the feeling that in order to be happy, one has to make other people suffer. Children who play video games tend to develop selfish behavior (Anderson & Bushman, 2001). Video games teach the player to be dependent and since the child is often left alone while playing a video game, he or she can develop selfish behavior. A certain study that was done at a Minneapolis-based national institute for media indicated that kids can get addicted to video games and exhibit social phobias. The interactive quality of video games is quite different from passively viewing movies or television. The games allow players to be active participants in the script. The players who are able to benefit from acts of violence are then able to proceed to the next level (Sherry, 2001).
As a negative result of playing video games, violence in children has shown an increase. “Anderson and Dill found that males who were high in aggression and irritability, showed the strongest association between video game play and aggressive behavior” (Lillian Bensely & Juliet Van Eenwyk, 2001). There are many incidents of violent behavior among children who play violent video games worldwide (Gunter, 1998). One of the high-profile incidents is the Columbine High School massacre that was caused by 17-year-old Dylan Klebold, and 18-year-old Harris Eric. The massacre happened on the 20th of April, 1999, at Columbine High School, located in Jefferson County. 12 pupils and a teacher were killed by two pupils. It was later revealed that the two shooters in the massacre were frequent players of weapon-based combat games. It was also noted that the two shooters used to play Wolfeinstein 3D and Doom, games which are violent. After the incident, many newspaper articles claimed that the key cause of that incident was violent video games.
Another incident occurred in April, 2000, when Jose Rabadan, a sixteen-year-old Spaniard, killed his parents and his sister using a katana sword, claiming that he was Squall Leonhart, the main character in the video game titled ‘Final Fantasy V111,’ on a mission of revenge. This was a consequence of playing the game too much and fantasizing about what he saw in the video game (Williams, & Marko, 2005). In 1997, there was the case of a thirteen year old, Wilson Noah, who was killed by his friend using a kitchen knife. The mother of the deceased claimed that Noah was stabbed because of the obsession his friend had with the video game known as Mortal Kombat. She alleged that the child who killed Noah was obsessed with the game, and thought he was one of the characters in the game named Cyrax. In the game, Cyrax uses a finishing move whereby he grabs the opponent and stabs him in the chest. It was alleged that this was the move that motivated the killing of that child. There are many other incidents that were caused by the effects of playing video games. A report that was compiled by the FBI in the year 2006 showed that the playing of video games among children was one of the behavioral traits linked to school shootings. The report outlined several factors behind school shootings of which playing violent video games was the most obvious (Anderson & Bushman, 2001).
According to Gentile and Anderson, playing video games increases the aggressive behavior of the player, since the acts of violence are continually repeated during the game (Gentile, & Anderson, 2003). “Although heightened physiological arousal (e.g., heart rate, blood pressure, skin conductance) can be beneficial in certain situations, physiological arousal produced by violent media (or by other sources), can be linked to an increase in aggressive behavior, especially when that arousal can be erroneously attributed to another provoking event, rather than to the violent media. Repetition of an act has been considered an effective teaching method, reinforcing learners patterns” (Barlett, Harris & Bruey, 2007).
The games encourage the players to roleplay or identify with their favorite character (Gentile & Anderson, 2003). The increase in physical bullying in many schools can also be linked to the popularity of video games that contain violent content. A study done in 2008 indicated that about 60% or more of middle school boys ended up striking or beating somebody after playing at least one mature-rated video game. The research also showed that about 39% of boys who never played violent video games were not involved in any form of violence. When playing video games, players are rewarded for simulating violence. This enhances the learning of violent behavior among the children who find pleasure in violent video games. When violence is rewarded while playing video games, players tend to develop aggressive behavior. As noted earlier, video games desensitize players to real-life violence. The exposure to video games causes a reduction in P300 amplitudes that are contained in the brain. The child will later experience aggressive behavior and desensitization to violence (Bartholow, Bushman & Sestir, 2006).
After children experience violence while playing video games, they are likely to develop a fear of becoming victims of violent acts. According to the report compiled by six leading national medical associations in 2000, children do not trust their fellow children and hence will develop violent, self-protective measures. The exposure to cruel video games also leads to reduced empathy among the players. From a survey conducted by Jeanne Funk in 2004, video games are the only media linked or associated with low empathy. Empathy is described as the capacity or ability to understand other people’s feelings. The level of empathy plays a noteworthy role in evaluating a person’s morals. Empathy also controls aggressive behavior among individuals, especially children (Bartholow, Bushman & Sestir, 2006). After lacking empathy as a consequence of violent video games, these children are likely to be violent. Repetition of actions when one is playing a video game affects the subconscious mind, hence a behavioral script is developed. An example of a behavioral script is that developed by drivers. It urges the driver to first get into a car, fasten their safety belt and then start the car. Similarly, video games induce a child to develop a behavioral script that urges them to respond violently to certain situations (Gunter, 1998).
Playing video games teaches children that violence is an acceptable way of solving their conflicts. Those who play video games, especially games with violent content, do not develop the belief that using non-violence means can solve a problem. They tend to be less forgiving when compared to those children who play non-violent video games (Sherry, 2001). Children tend to confuse real-world violence with video game violence. After fantasizing about the violence in video games, children are likely to fight in schools and in the streets. New video games allow a lot of physical interaction with the players. Some video games train players on how to be a killer. For example, in 1996, the Marine Corps in the United States authorized the release of Doom 11, which was a violent video game. The game was previously used to train marine soldiers. Such games can train children to be high-profile killers. Also, most video games have portrayed a negative attitude towards women. Violence against women is likely to increase in a child who plays brutal video games (Gunter, 1998).
In any life situation and with any sort of problem, there are those who disagree with the majority. Likewise, there are researchers who present various counter arguments to support the idea that video games can be beneficial for children. The first counter argument against the side effects of video games is the fact that children are not isolated, as they have online gaming communities. Children who are unable to associate with others do not feel isolated since they can play video games. For example, a child who is not physically fit to play with others can turn to video games during their free time to reduce boredom (Dietz, 1998).
It has been noted that violent juvenile crimes have been decreasing in the recent years, yet the popularity of video games has been increasing. For the period from 1995 to 2008, the rate of the arrest of juvenile murderers decreased by 71.9%, while the overall arrest cases concerning juvenile violence decreased by 49%. In the same period, the sale of cruel video games increased by almost 4 times compared to the years before. From these statistics, one can conclude that there is no direct correlation between violent juvenile crimes and video games. There has been no scientifically-proven link between violent behavior among children and video games. Most of the surveys carried out on video games are affected by design flaws. The surveys are done within a short duration of time and do not follow kids for any considerable period of time. After a short observation, conclusions are drawn (Barlett, Harris and Bruey, 539-546).
The other counter argument against video games is that children learn real life-skills when playing video games. Players of brutal video games are able to learn how to regulate their emotions when playing (Anderson, Gentile, & Buckley, 2007). The level of control developed while playing video games in terms of directing actions and pace are prudent ways of regulating the emotional state of children. The perception of being in control of actions minimizes emotional and stressful responses to events. Aggressive and angry feelings can be relieved by playing video games. When a child plays video games, it is one of the best ways of relieving aggression and depression. Many children play video games to relieve anger while others play video games to relax their bodies. Children are given healthy and safe opportunities to virtually explore the rules and consequences of violent behavior when they play video games (Bartholow, Bushman & Sestir, 2006).
After playing videogames, especially ones that contain violence, children are able to develop ways of escaping violence. The form of violence can be affected by video games, but does not necessarily lead to the occurrence of violence. Through the challenges faced while playing some video games, children are able to learn how to avoid violence, or how to escape from violence. Those who hold the view that video games do not have negative effects on children indicate that video games do not lead a child to violence, but instead, violent children are the ones who are interested in video games (Anderson, Gentile & Buckley, 2007).
The argument about whether video games have negative or positive effects on children is broad, and depends on one’s philosophical views. “Most of the research projects that have been conducted on the authentic effects of media brutality on behavior of children have included small, often unrepresentative samples and unique examples of media violence” (Dietz, 1998). This paper has compiled some of the negative effects of video games among children. Some of the negative effects include children feeling isolated from their society, becoming more violent and aggressive, as well as lacking communicative skills. When playing video games, children spend extended periods of time by themselves and do not have much interaction with other children, except for the virtual ones. As a result, children who play video games excessively do not develop effective communication skills with others, since hours, if not all their spare time, is spent on video games. There has also been a rise in violence among children who play video games, the Columbine High School massacre being one such example. Injuries and fighting at home and outdoors have risen because of children playing brutal video games (Anderson, Gentile, & Buckley, 2007). Some researchers however argue that video games can and do have positive effects on children. They point out that children are not isolated, as they develop online gaming communities. Children are also able to learn real-life skills while playing video games, as well as learn how to escape violence. However, what both sides agree upon is that parents should guide their children on the outcomes of playing video games. Personally, I think that video games can be allowed when selected with caution and are not played frequently. As long as virtual reality does not replace a child’s real-life communication, video games can become a great option for a child’s leisure.
Sign up and we’ll send you ebook of 1254 samples like this for free!
- 80+ essay types
- 1000+ essay samples
- Pro writing tips